As we approach this text, I want to keep before you the profit that is to be realized through it. Scripture has been written deliberately, with a Divine objective in mind. God chose “holy men,” moving them along by the Holy Spirit, to put into writing His own purpose and perspective. I acknowledge that applying the word “perspective” to the view of the Living God comes far short of what I intend. It is not that there are any other valid perspectives. Viewed correctly, God’s view, or perspective, is really the ONLY valid one. I use the word to underscore that there is a heavenly way of seeing things – even history. The interrelationships of humanity are under the supervision of the Almighty. I am careful to note this does not mean everything that happens between people is orchestrated by God in all of its details. We must take care not to ascribe the murder of Abel by Cain as directed by the Lord. Such events, however, are all managed by Him, work together for His ultimate glory, and are written for our learning. This perception is essential to a profitable understanding of Scripture.

            How frequently we are reminded of the reason for Scripture. Jesus spoke of His imminent death as a fulfillment of Scripture. “Behold, we go up to Jerusalem, and all things that are written by the prophets concerning the Son of man shall be accomplished” (Luke 18:31). When speaking of the destruction of Jerusalem, He said, “For these be the days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled” (Luke 21:22). Jesus told those who came to arrest Him in the garden, “Are ye come out, as against a thief, with swords and with staves to take Me? I was daily with you in the temple teaching, and ye took Me not: but the scriptures must be fulfilled” (Mark 14:49). When Peter sought to defend Him in the garden of betrayal, Jesus responded, “Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to My Father, and He shall presently give me more than twelve legions of angels? But how then shall the Scriptures be fulfilled, that thus it must be?” (Matt 26:53-54).

            Following His resurrection, when walking with the two on the road to Emmaus, “He expounded unto them in all the scriptures the things concerning Himself” (Luke 24:47). His declarations confirm there are Divine intentions reflected in Scripture. This is involved in their inspiration. They are not merely an accurate record of what happened. Neither, indeed, are they primarily an outline of obligations God has placed upon humanity. Nor are they only an abstract of what is required to be saved. All of these are, indeed, found in Scripture, but they are not its heart.

THE SCRIPTURES HAVE PURPOSE

            Men must come away from a merely intellectual view of the Word of God. God has provided the Scriptures for purposes that have more to do with life that with bare information. Through them, the Holy Spirit is doing infinitely more than acquainting us with past events, although that is involved.

     THESE THINGS HAPPENED FOR A REASON! “Now all these things happened unto them for ensamples . . . ” It would be difficult, if not impossible, to substantiate that every single occurrence in the lives of all people are determined by God. However, when it comes to Scripture, the records of those people and events directly relate to Divine purpose. Within that context, what is recorded was not only orchestrated by the Lord, but actually occurred for our benefit and learning. In these events, such as the record before us, an example of Divine direction is made known. The manner in which God manages the affairs of His people is also revealed.

     WRITTEN FOR OUR ADMONITION. “ . . . and they are written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the world are come.” (1 Cor 10:11). The purpose for the Scriptures includes our admonition, or warning. Care must be taken not to conduct our lives in such a manner as to contradict God’s way of working. In our text, that would involve refusing to yield to the edicts of men when they are in violation of the Word of the Lord. 

     WRITTEN FOR OUR LEARNING. “For whatsoever things were written aforetime were written for our learning . . . ” Learning goes beyond mathematical theorems, historical events, and reading skills. Through Scripture, or what is written, we become acquainted with the ways and purposes of the Living God. We learn how He reacts to those who trust in Him, and how He works all things together for the good of those who love Him, being called into His purpose.  

     THAT WE MIGHT HAVE HOPE. “ . . . that we through patience and comfort of the scriptures might have hope.” (Rom 15:4). Hope comes from God (2 Thess 2:16), but not independently of means. Patience (or endurance) and comfort (encouragement) are obtained through the Scriptures. That is, as we perceive the hand of the Lord in its recorded events, and the unwavering commitments of an unchanging God, we receive the resources needed to complete the race set before us. 

     MAKE US WISE UNTO SALVATION. “And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.” (2 Tim 3:16-17). The Scriptures raise our spiritual IQ concerning the salvation of God. Through them, we become more familiar with the nature of salvation, as well as how it is appropriated and maintained within the individual.

     PROFITABLE. “All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: that the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works” (2 Tim 3:16-17). When correctly perceived, the Scripture are fuel for the soul. They enable believers to engage in the “good works” for which they were created in Christ Jesus (Eph 2:10).

NOT LIFELESS DOGMA

            All of this is, indeed, pertinent to the review of our text. In our study of the Scriptures, we must do everything possible to avoid the development or embrace of lifeless dogma. This is particularly relevant when we are considering the providential working of the Lord. If we do not guard our hearts, such knowledge will tend to make us less involved with the Lord, moving us to suppose that God works independently of human involvement.

            The above texts have related the Scriptures to admonition, learning, patience, comfort, hope, wisdom, profit, and being ready to do every good work. Those are all aspects of life – spiritual life. If our text does not yield these benefits in some decisive measure, we have missed its purpose. What is outlined in this text “happened” as an example for us. It shows how God works things together for the good of those who love Him, and are called according to His purpose (Rom 8:28). They have been written to admonish our hearts about not yielding to competing influences, but to stand firm in the faith. It is possible, and needful, that we learn from this text that those who believe will not be ashamed. If we are in circumstances that are less than ideal, an enduring spirit, strong consolation, and good hope, will be ministered to us in this text. If our faith will take hold of these words, we will become more adequate to do the works God has planned for us – and He has surely planned works for us (Eph 2:10).

            Faith is able to make a connection between this text and the personal good fight of faith. Through it we can be assured of God’s involvement in our own walk of faith and labor of love. We have not been left alone in this world!

FAVOR WITH THE PRINCE

“ ^{Dan 1:9} Now God had brought Daniel into favor and tender love with the prince of the eunuchs.” Other versions read, “God had brought Daniel into the favor and goodwill of the chief of the eunuchs,” ^NKJV “God granted Daniel favor and compassion in the sight of the commander of the officials” ^NASB “God made Daniel to find kindness and compassion in the sight of the prince of the eunuchs,” ^ASV “God had caused the official to show favor and sympathy to Daniel,” ^NIV “God allowed Daniel to receive favor and compassion from the palace master,” ^NRSV “God gave Daniel favor and compassion in the sight of the chief of the eunuchs,” ^RSV “God had given the chief official great respect for Daniel,” ^NLT

THE LORD’S DOING

            The Holy Spirit is careful to give us an accurate view of the circumstance. He will not allow us to remain ignorant of the particular working of the Lord – of His involvement in the affairs of men. In unveiling these affairs, He never exaggerates, is totally without guile, and avoids vagueness and ambiguity. He will not leave us thinking about fate, luck, or happenstance. He will precisely and effectively explain to us WHY Daniel was well liked and held in high regard by an official of the king’s court.

            “Now God had brought Daniel into favor . . . ” Other versions further unfold the intricacies of this statement. The favor of Daniel in the eyes of the prince was “granted” by God, ^NASB “caused” by God, ^NIV and “brought” by God. ^Webster The Lord, then, who has access to men’s hearts, caused the prince to be especially favorable to Daniel. He did so without compromising His own holy character, and without violating the Divine imagery in the prince.

            Several preliminary conclusions can be drawn from this text. 

     The work had already been done: “had brought.” ^NKJV “had caused the official to show favor.” ^NRSV 

     This was a special dispensation from the Lord: “granted Daniel favor.” ^NASB “God gave Daniel favor.” ^RSV “had given the chief official great respect.” ^NLT 

     This was something God caused, or made to happen: “made Daniel to find kindness.” ^ASV “had caused the official to show favor.” ^NRSV

An Answer to Solomon’s Prayer

            This circumstance was, in a sense, an answer to the prayer of Solomon during the dedication of the Temple. In that marvelous and lengthy prayer, the king prayed, “and give them compassion before them who carried them captive, that they may have compassion on them” (1 Kgs 8:50). Other versions read, “grant them compassion,” ^NKJV “make them objects of compassion,” ^NASB and “cause their conquerors to show them mercy.” ^NIV

Not An Isolated Incident

      As magnificent as this incident is, it is not an isolated one. This is the manner of God with His people – to cause them to receive favor from those who would normally be considered their enemies. His power is used for such purposes. 

     JOSEPH: “But the LORD was with Joseph, and showed him mercy, and gave him favor in the sight of the keeper of the prison” (Gen 39:21). “And delivered him out of all his afflictions, and gave him favor and wisdom in the sight of Pharaoh king of Egypt; and he made him governor over Egypt and all his house” (Acts 7:10)

     ISRAEL: “And I will give this people favor in the sight of the Egyptians” (Ex 3:21). “And the LORD gave the people favor in the sight of the Egyptians” (Ex 11:3). “And the LORD gave the people favor in the sight of the Egyptians” (Ex 12:36). “He made them also to be pitied of all those that carried them captives” (Psa 106:46). 

     EZRA: “Blessed be the LORD God of our fathers, which . . . extended mercy unto me before the king, and his counselors, and before all the king's mighty princes” (Ezra 7:27). 

     NEHEMIAH: “O Lord, I beseech thee, let now thine ear be attentive to the prayer of thy servant, and to the prayer of thy servants, who desire to fear thy name: and prosper, I pray thee, thy servant this day, and grant him mercy in the sight of this man . . . And the king granted me, according to the good hand of my God upon me” (Neh 1:11; 2:8).

            Solomon put it this way, “When a man's ways please the LORD, He makes even his enemies to be at peace with him” ^NKJV (Prov 16:7). The Living God is over the mind, affections, and emotions of men. He can “open” hearts (Acts 16:14). He can also “turn” hearts (Prov 21:1). This is not a circumstance for which endless details are provided. There are, however, examples given of this activity in order that our faith may be strengthened.

            God’s people are not moved about at the whims of mortal men! Although, on the surface, it may appear as though everything was in the hands of men, it was not. God was orchestrating the affairs of Daniel, just as He does with all who are in His favor. That is precisely involved in the statement, “God causes all things to work together for good to those who love God, to those who are called according to His purpose” ^NASB (Rom 8:28).

The Lesson to be Learned

            There is a lesson to be learned here. Those who put their trust in God can have the assurance that God will defend them. “But let all those that put their trust in thee rejoice: let them ever shout for joy, because Thou defendest them” (Psa 5:11). Again, those who seek the Lord in their afflictions and trials will not be disappointed. “for thou, LORD, hast not forsaken them that seek thee” (Psa 9:10). The Lord can lift you out of the circumstances, as He delivered Israel from Egypt, Daniel from the lion’s den, and the three Hebrew children from the fiery furnace. OR, He can cause you to find favor with those who are your enemies, as He did Joseph in prison, or Ezra and Nehemiah in Persia. With God, all things are possible!

TENDER LOVE

            The expression “tender love” is not a romantic one. With the general acceptance of sodomy, base and corrupt views of this text have been espoused and zealously promulgated. That circumstances requires that something be said about this expression.

            The words “tender love” are translated as follows in other versions. “Goodwill,” ^NKJV “compassion,” ^NASB “sympathy,” ^NIV “mercy,” ^Douay “pity,” ^BBE and “great respect.” ^NLT

            The word “tender” emphasizes the sympathy, pity, and respect the “prince” had for Daniel. The word “love” confirms that he was inclined to do good to Daniel, and seek certain advantages for him. “Tender love” is the opposite of the perspective of an enemy, who lays traps and snares for those he hates, and seeks an occasion to bring them into shame and disgrace. The “prince of eunuchs” did not seek to make Daniel stumble and fall, but to protect him, and see to it that his interests and protection were served.

            Note, the attitude of Ashpenaz was “caused” by the Almighty God. It was a heavenly grant, or gift, to prepare the way for Daniel’s protection and prominence before king Nebuchadnezzar. Now, when Daniel presents his case to the man placed over him, that man will be inclined to hear what he says, and provide the provisions he requests. As “the Breaker” God had gone before him, preparing the way (Mal 2:13). As with Cyrus, the Lord went before Daniel, making crooked places straight (Isa 45:2), clearing the path on which he was placed. It is no different with you!

            I have found that it requires great faith and a persistent spirit to maintain this perspective. Our current spiritual environment, at least in the Western world, is not conducive to the maintenance of such a view. Yet, it is absolutely essential that we do so. Let us encourage such a posture!

A PROBING QUESTION

            “ ¹⁰ And the prince of the eunuchs said unto Daniel, I fear my lord the king, who hath appointed your meat and your drink: for why should he see your faces worse liking than the children which are of your sort? then shall ye make me endanger my head to the king.”

I FEAR THE KING!

            The “prince” is a good servant to the king, as well as one who seeks the genuine interest of the four Hebrew lads. He does not simply order Daniel to eat what is set before him, but reasons with him. Nor, indeed, does he immediately grant Daniel his request. Daniel had “asked the chief official for permission not to defile himself this way” ^NIV (verse 8). Now his faith will be tested. Even though Ashpenaz was especially drawn to Daniel, and desired to do good to him, yet he also was mindful of the king. He knows all to well that the suggestion of Daniel will not set well with Nebuchadnezzar. Thus he immediately answers, “I am afraid of my lord the king, who has appointed your food and your drink.” ^NASB He would not violate the trust of the king at the suggestion of a young captive!

SOMETHING TO SEE

            In this we see that God does not turn men into impersonal and unthinking robots. The fact that He “caused the official to show favor and sympathy to Daniel” ^NIV did not mean that official would have no regard for the king. Neither, indeed, would he simply default to showing Daniel favor at the expense of displeasing the king.

            In a moral arena, where decisions are made, and thoughtfulness occurs, it is essential that patience and wisdom be found in those who trust the Lord. They will be required to assess their circumstances, and to respond to them in the wisdom of faith.

Times When God Does It All

            There are times when believers are simply brought through a circumstance with little of their own involvement. In such cases, the Lord undertakes for them as they simply wait upon Him.

     The drowning of Pharaoh’s army. “The LORD shall fight for you, and ye shall hold your peace” (Ex 14:14).

     When Jehosaphat faced the Ammonites and Moabites. “Ye shall not need to fight in this battle: set yourselves, stand ye still, and see the salvation of the LORD with you, O Judah and Jerusalem: fear not, nor be dismayed; to morrow go out against them: for the LORD will be with you . . . And when they began to sing and to praise, the LORD set ambushments against the children of Ammon, Moab, and mount Seir, which were come against Judah; and they were smitten” (2 Chron 20:17,22).

     Peter’s deliverance from prison. “And, behold, the angel of the Lord came upon him, and a light shined in the prison: and he smote Peter on the side, and raised him up, saying, Arise up quickly. And his chains fell off from his hands. And the angel said unto him, Gird thyself, and bind on thy sandals. And so he did. And he saith unto him, Cast thy garment about thee, and follow me” (Acts 12:7-8).

Times When Involvement Is Required

            However, every deliverance is not after this manner. There are times when the ones being delivered are required to engage in considerable preparation and activity.

     Noah building the ark. “Make thee an ark of gopher wood; rooms shalt thou make in the ark, and shalt pitch it within and without with pitch. And this is the fashion which thou shalt make it of: The length of the ark shall be three hundred cubits, the breadth of it fifty cubits, and the height of it thirty cubits.” (Gen 6:14-15).

     Paul being lowered over wall in a basket by the disciples. “But their laying await was known of Saul. And they watched the gates day and night to kill him. Then the disciples took him by night, and let him down by the wall in a basket” (Acts 9:24-25).

     Obadiah hiding one hundred prophets in a cave during the oppression of Jezebel. “For it was so, when Jezebel cut off the prophets of the LORD, that Obadiah took an hundred prophets, and hid them by fifty in a cave, and fed them with bread and water. (1 Kgs 18:4).

Times of No Apparent Deliverance

            There are also times when no deliverance is apparent – when it appears as though the enemy triumphs. 

     The killing of Abel. “And Cain talked with Abel his brother: and it came to pass, when they were in the field, that Cain rose up against Abel his brother, and slew him” (Gen 4:8).

     The murder of Zachariah the prophet. “That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar” (Matt 23:35). 

     The stoning of Stephen. “And they stoned Stephen, calling upon God, and saying, Lord Jesus, receive my spirit. And he kneeled down, and cried with a loud voice, Lord, lay not this sin to their charge. And when he had said this, he fell asleep” (Acts 7:59-60).     

            Those who imagine that living by faith is simplistic do well to examine their persuasion. There are no guarantees about the details of Divine deliverance! The Lord may simply crush your enemies without you lifting your hand or voice, as He did with Pharaoh and his armies. He may extend your presence among your enemies, calling upon you to engage in prolonged and hearty activity, like Noah building the ark. And, you may fall before your enemies in seeming defeat, like Stephen before the Jewish council. Deliverance occurred in all of these cases, but it was identical. Israel realized instant and obvious victory. Noah waited long, and then was delivered in seclusion from his enemies. Stephen was wafted into the heavenly realms, and afforded a glimpse of a standing Savior while he was dying.

            Simplistic souls are prone to declare the details of Israel’s deliverance as the standard. Those with a propensity toward works will be inclined to declare that the only valid picture of deliverance is that of Noah and his family. Those who do not see the Lord as a great Deliverer might be inclined to think Stephen’s experience is the standard. All three views are wrong. They neither represent God nor circumstance correctly. Living by faith is not that simplistic, and we do well not to be so naive as to think it is.

A PROBING QUESTION

            The way in which the Lord will accomplish the deliverance of the four children of Judah will portray yet another Divine manner. In this case, some dialogue will be required, as well as judgment and wisdom.

            “ . . . For why should he see your faces looking worse than the young men who are your age? Then you would endanger my head before the king.” A worthy question, indeed! The “prince of the eunuchs” has been given an order by the king. Under ordinary circumstances, this involved a diet that would promote a healthy appearance before the king. Now, Ashpenaz reasons that the failure of Daniel and his colleagues to submit to this diet would promote an inferior appearance. That, in turn, would reveal he had not obeyed the edict of the king, and would result in his sure death.

            Thus he puts forth two reasons why the suggestion of Daniel does not seem wise. First, it would result in haggard looks for the boys. Second, it would cost him his life. Both of these are weighty considerations. How will Daniel respond? Or will he respond at all? Unbelief would conclude it must be the Lord’s will to eat the king’s diet. However, Daniel trusts in God. Now, we will see how faith works, trusting God and speaking wisely at the same time. It faces potential danger, finding a way to confront it that will honor God, and respect the king as well.

NOT ALL YOUTHS WERE THE SAME

            The directive of the king was “that he should bring certain of the children of Israel, and of the king's seed, and of the princes” (1:3). While we may conclude that only Daniel, Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah were selected, the text does not demand such a conclusion. In fact, verse six affirms they were “among” the ones chosen for special orientation. The larger group were “of the children of Israel, and of the king's seed, and of the princes” (verse 3), while within that group were the four “of the children of Judah.”

            There is no record of any of the other young men speaking up, or objecting to the special diet imposed by the king. Three years later, when all of those in the orientation were brought before the king, “among them all was found none like Daniel, Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah” (verse 19). An apparently significant number of children were found among the captures Israelites. Yet, only the four children of Judah “stood before the king.” Many were selected. Many successfully passed through the orientation program. However, only four of them were brought into the royal court.

            It is a principle in the Kingdom of God, that those who are at last exalted, must prove faithful in the beginning. What a noble example we have in these boys! Thank God for their record!

THE ANSWER OF FAITH

            “ ¹¹Then said Daniel to Melzar, whom the prince of the eunuchs had set over Daniel, Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah, ¹² Prove thy servants, I beseech thee, ten days; and let them give us pulse to eat, and water to drink.” Keep in mind, this is a young boy replying to the decree of a king. He does not fall backward in fear at the answer of his custodian. Nor, indeed, does he conclude there is no need to say anything more. He has determined in his heart not to defile himself, and human reasoning will not move him to abandon that determination. It is for this reason, that God now grants Daniel wisdom to answer the objections of those over him.

HE ANSWERS THE IMMEDIATE SUBORDINATE

            Daniel honors the king, giving due respect to the protocol that has been put in place. He does not send a letter to Nebuchadnezzar. Nor, indeed, does he speak directly to Ashpenaz. Instead, he addresses his words to “Melzar,” whom Asphenaz has placed over the four boys.

            It appears from this text that the prince, Ashpenaz, had concluded his discussion with Daniel. His last word was that he would be putting himself at risk to disobey the king, and he felt the four children of Judah would be the worse for choosing another diet. For many, that would have ended the matter. Flesh would reason that the Lord had closed the door to any possible change in the diet. After all, the one in charge had rejected the pleas of Daniel. There was no need for further discussion. A shallow person would conclude it must be all right to eat what the king sets before them. A legalistic heart would simply refuse to eat the food, going on a self-imposed fast. Being full of faith, however, Daniel will choose yet another course.

Faith Is Persistent

            However, faith can find paths that are not evident. Godly intentions do not retreat into forgetfulness when they are challenged by earthly dignitaries. Faith can reach upward, laying hold upon the Living God. It can then probe earthly circumstances, being used by God to arrive at creative solutions. This, as we will see, is done in wisdom and prudence.

A TEST IS PROPOSED

            Remember, this is a young boy that is speaking. Yet, it is not merely a young boy, but one who has faith in God and a determination not to eat what His Lord has forbidden – even though the king demands it.

One Speaks for All

            “Then said Daniel . . . ” Although there are four lads, and each one “showing intelligence in every branch of wisdom, endowed with understanding, and discerning knowledge, and who had ability for serving in the king's court,” ^NASB yet they do not all speak for themselves. They are in perfect accord, and one can speak for them all.

            This is one of the marvelous benefits of the “unity of the faith” (Eph 4:13). One can accurately and effectively speak for all. This is what happened on the day of Pentecost, when Peter spoke in the behalf of the other eleven Apostles. “But Peter, standing up with the eleven, lifted up his voice, and said unto them . . . ” (Acts 2:14). He did not upstage the others, but spoke for them all, thereby removing the confusion caused by simultaneous voices.

            In our text, Daniel does the same, presenting the case of all four children about something concerning which they were in perfect accord.

A Earnest Appeal

            “Prove . . . I beseech thee . . . ” Other versions read, “Please test” ^NKJV “Try, I beseech thee” ^DOUAY “Try, I pray thee.” ^YLT Although they are members of a Divinely chosen race, the seed of Abraham, they speak humbly, making an appeal to the one placed over them. They are, after all, in a foreign land, and their nation is under the chastening hand of God. This is not the time to be arrogant, or affirm the superiority of the Jews. Yet, their circumstance still does not justify forgetting their covenant with God, and the various dietary laws that God had imposed upon them. Therefore, Daniel makes an earnest appeal to the official.

            Although “all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God,” vestiges of the Divine nature remains in them. God can enable His people to make appeals to that part of man in which a spark of tenderness may yet exist. While this is not an area where we can make laws, it is one that can offer great hope to believers that are living under less-than-ideal circumstances. It is possible to be under a person who seems heartless and inconsiderate. It could be a husband, a father, a manager, or the governor of the land. Such circumstances can open the door for the entrance of despair and hopelessness, pummeling the oppressed person down to the basement of depression. There is an alternative.

            Like Daniel, we can appeal to the Divine imagery in people – the part that is capable of kindness and consideration. You may think the person incapable of such a reaction, but do not assume that is the case. The “prince of the eunuchs” has already rejected Daniel’s plea. Now he presses the matter further, making a strong appeal to the willingness of an official to submit to a fair test.

            A few examples will serve to buttress this principle in our thinking – namely, that we can make appeals to people to be considerate, rather than attempting to impose our will upon them, or giving the appearance of being obstinate. 

     Abraham appeals to Lot when contention arises among their servants. “Let there be no strife, I pray thee, between me and thee, and between my herdmen and thy herdmen; for we be brethren” (Gen 13:8). A solution was found.

     Joseph appealed to Pharaoh to allow him to go and bury his father Jacob, even though it would interrupt his official duties. “If now I have found grace in your eyes, speak, I pray you, in the ears of Pharaoh, saying, My father made me swear, saying, Lo, I die: in my grave which I have digged for me in the land of Canaan, there shalt thou bury me. Now therefore let me go up, I pray thee, and bury my father, and I will come again” (Gen 50:4-5). Pharaoh consented to do so.

     Rahab appealed to the good will of the Israelite spies, even though she was a citizen of a cursed city. “Now therefore, I pray you, swear unto me by the LORD, since I have showed you kindness, that ye will also show kindness unto my father's house, and give me a true token: And that ye will save alive my father, and my mother, and my brethren, and my sisters, and all that they have, and deliver our lives from death” (Josh 2:12-13). She received her request.

     Esther appealed to the good will of king Ahasuerus as she pled for her people, the Jews. “If I have found favor in thy sight, O king, and if it please the king, let my life be given me at my petition, and my people at my request: For we are sold, I and my people, to be destroyed, to be slain, and to perish. But if we had been sold for bondmen and bondwomen, I had held my tongue, although the enemy could not countervail the king's damage” (Esth 7:3-4).

     Paul, when faced with the unjust accusations of bigoted Jews, appealed to Caesar, allowing God to work through the judicial system. “But when the Jews spake against it, I was constrained to appeal unto Caesar; not that I had ought to accuse my nation of. For this cause therefore have I called for you, to see you, and to speak with you: because that for the hope of Israel I am bound with this chain” (Acts 28:19-20). He was given a hearing, and even provided Roman protection from the evil intentions of the Jews.

            As I have said, this is not an area in which hard and fast laws can be made. It is, however, an area in which faith can work and wisdom can be exhibited. Sometimes our desires are not met simply because we did not have the good sense to make a humble appeal to the Divine imagery in those who seem to have been overcome with hardness and bitterness.

            I am not suggesting that all such appeals will be honored, for no such guarantee is given to us. Herod killed John the Baptist and James the brother of John. Stephen was stoned by the Jewish council to whom he appealed. Notwithstanding, we can cast out bread upon the waters, doing our best to work with the circumstances before us, as Daniel did in our text.

As Willing Subordinates

            “ . . . thy servants . . . ” Notice, Daniel does not present his case as one who is being held hostage against his will. He speaks for all four of the lads, affirming themselves to be “thy servants.” Rebelling against the will of the king is not their manner. They are not insurrectionists like Barabbas (Mark 15:7). They are not anti-Babylonians, standing against all of their customs for no other reason than that they are Jews. They are willing to serve, and would not have raised this issue if very important matters were not at stake.

            After David had killed Goliath, Abner brought him before king Saul “with the head of the Philistine in his hand.” When Saul asked him, “Whose son art thou, thou young man?”, David quickly answered, “I am the son of thy servant Jesse the Bethlehemite” (1 Sam 17:57-58). He was not ashamed to acknowledge the obligation of his family to the king. It was not the superior relationship, but it was a valid one.

            Daniel now presents his case to the officer. He is responding for four Jewish lads who, under ordinary circumstances, were quite willing to do what the king requested. They were his servants, and he would make his petition for them in that capacity.

A Limited Duration

            “ . . . ten days . . .” The test that Daniel proposes is not a long one. He seems to sense a lengthy duration of time would tax the patience of the officer, and give room for doubt in his mind. He therefore asks for a period of testing that is less than one and a half weeks – “ten days.” Considering the nature of his request, this is an extremely short period of time. It is apparent, however, that Daniel knew God could work within this time frame. It was reasonable for God, and would be nearly, if not altogether, miraculous in the eyes of a Babylonian. By the same token, if the king’s diet was actually superior, this would be sufficient time to prove the inferiority of the suggested substitute diet.

            Thus, Daniel asks for a period of time adequate to yield observable results, yet reasonable enough to NOT tax the patience of the officer.

            It is my persuasion that this period of time was made known to Daniel by the Lord. I do not know if Daniel himself was aware of this, for the Lord can put a thought in a person’s mind without the person being fully aware of its Source. When Jesus was among us, He confessed, “I do nothing of Myself; but as My Father hath taught Me, I speak these things” (John 8:28). This is the manner of the Kingdom. The difference is that Jesus operated in full cognizance of this situation. Others have been moved by God, but were not fully aware that was the case. Examples of this lack of awareness include Samson (Judges 14:2-4) and David (2 Sam 24:1).

An Alternative Diet

            “ . . . and let them give us pulse to eat, and water to drink.” Nothing was left to guesswork. Daniel did not suggest that the officer find another diet, but suggested one himself, thus making the choice easier for the man.

“Pulse”

            The word “pulse” is a contemporary word, though not often used. It means “the edible seeds of various leguminous crops (as peas, beans, or lentils” ^{MERRIAM-WEBSTER} The word is also used in Second Samuel. The occasion was the conflict between David and his son Absalom, who was engaged in a quest to seize the throne. A number of men were with David, and they were “hungry, and weary, and thirsty, in the wilderness.” Three men (Shobi, Machir, and Barzillai) brought beds, basins, and food for the men. Part of the food they provided was “parched pulse,” or “roasted grain.” ^NIV

            “Pulse,” or leguminous crops, are plants whose seed itself is the food, whether from the root (as potatoes or turnips), or from the plant above the ground (as peas, beans, or grain). This distinguishes the food from leafy vegetables (as greens), or the plant stalk (as with broccoli or celery). This is the kind of food God initially gave to Adam: “every herb that yields seed” ^NKJV (Gen 1:29). It was even the type of food with which God miraculously sustained Israel in the wilderness – “manna,” which “was like coriander seed” (Ex 16:31).

“Water to Drink”

            Daniel asks for the ordinary beverage – nothing unusual. God’s law did not demand that His people drink only water. If fact, unless a person was a Nazarite (Num 6:3) or a priest (Lev 10:9), there was no prohibition against drinking wine in moderate portions. God even blessed the winepresses of the Israelites, telling them to share that bounty with liberated Hebrew slaves (Deut 15:12-14). But Daniel did not suggest they drink Jewish wine instead of the king’s wine. Nor, indeed, does he suggest they drink “milk,” found abundantly in the promised land (Ex 3:8; 33:3). The superiority of faith would not be seen in such a procedure.

            But when plain water causes the lads to be more healthy and comely in appearance, God will be more apt to receive the glory. Let it be clear, “pulse” and “water” did not give the lads a superior countenance because they promoted good health, but because God blessed the four boys, honoring their faith and determination to please Him.

A Near Miraculous Diet

            Considering the desired outcome of the king’s diet, I would be inclined to consider “pulse” a near miraculous diet. Some have noted that such a diet is “not naturally calculated to render them fatter in flesh than the others.” ^{TSK-ALL NOTES} It would rather be more apt to produce a lean and less fat appearance, NOT “fatter in flesh” (verse 15).

IMPORTUNITY

            There is a lesson here in importunity, or a faith that continues to press the issue. Ordinarily, this is applied to prayer made to God. On one occasion, Christ’s disciples asked Him, “Lord, teach us to pray, as John also taught his disciples.” It was at that time that Jesus gave them what is commonly known as “the Lord’s prayer” (Matt 6:9-13). Luke gives only the first part of that prayer, then adds some words pertinent to our text. “Which of you shall have a friend, and shall go unto him at midnight, and say unto him, Friend, lend me three loaves; For a friend of mine in his journey is come to me, and I have nothing to set before him? And he from within shall answer and say, Trouble me not: the door is now shut, and my children are with me in bed; I cannot rise and give thee. I say unto you, Though he will not rise and give him, because he is his friend, yet because of his importunity he will rise and give him as many as he needeth. And I say unto you, Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you. For every one that asketh receiveth; and he that seeketh findeth; and to him that knocketh it shall be opened” (Lk 11:1-10).

            When he was first rejected, Daniel did not give up. He pressed the matter, taking it up with the next in charge. He had “importunity!” He did not simply repeat the request, but wrapped it in a plausible suggestion. As I have said, I cannot but believe God was moving him in this matter, giving him the wisdom to recommend a reasonable solution.

            All of this followed the determination Daniel had already made in his heart. “Daniel purposed in his heart that he would not defile himself with the portion of the king's meat, nor with the wine which he drank” (1:8). That decision opened the windows of heaven to Daniel. Strength was imparted to carry out his resolve. Faith was granted to do so confidently. Wisdom was imparted that would allow for his request to be fulfilled in an orderly way that caused no disruption among the king’s officials.

DANIEL’S CONSIDERATION

            I do not want to leave this section without noting Daniel’s consideration of Melzar, the steward of Ashpenaz. Remember, Ashpenaz considered Daniel’s request a threat to his own life. If the youths stood before the king “looking more haggard than the youths who are your own age? Then you would make me forfeit my head to the king” ^NASB (1:10).

            Daniel had not forgotten that word. Through the gracious direction of the Lord, he carefully crafted a suggestion that would also preserve the lives of those placed over him. He sought to “do good unto all men” (Gal 6:10), even in this critical matter.

FAITH SUBMITS TO EXAMINATION

            “ ¹³ Then let our countenances be looked upon before thee, and the countenance of the children that eat of the portion of the king's meat: and as thou seest, deal with thy servants.” Those who lean their souls upon the Lord can stand before the scrutiny of men! God has declared, “And whoever believes on Him will not be put to shame” (Rom 9:33). Some versions read, “will not be disappointed,” ^NASB or “will never be put to shame.” ^NIV Isaiah, who lived and wrote before Daniel, said, “But Israel shall be saved in the LORD with an everlasting salvation: ye shall not be ashamed nor confounded world without end” (Isa 45:17).

            Long before the inauguration of the marvelous New Covenant, holy men sensed that God could keep those who made holy resolves. They would petition God to keep them from being ashamed or confounded. David prayed, “In thee, O LORD, do I put my trust; let me never be ashamed: deliver me in thy righteousness” (Psa 31:1). Isaiah wrote, “For the Lord GOD will help me; therefore shall I not be confounded: therefore have I set my face like a flint, and I know that I shall not be ashamed” (Isa 50:7).

            This is an aspect of faith that could well be more prominent among us. The Lord encourages us to seek to avoid disappointment and shame. He is not only able to keep us from falling (Jude 24-25), but to keep us from being ashamed, confounded, or disappointed. His Word promotes such a posture!

            FIRST, He promises that those who trust and hope in Him will not be ashamed.

     “The LORD knoweth the days of the upright: and their inheritance shall be for ever. They shall not be ashamed in the evil time” (Psa 37:18-19).

     “But Israel shall be saved in the LORD with an everlasting salvation: ye shall not be ashamed nor confounded world without end” (Isa 45:17). 

     “ . . . and thou shalt know that I am the LORD: for they shall not be ashamed that wait for me” (Isa 49:23). 

     “Fear not; for thou shalt not be ashamed: neither be thou confounded; for thou shalt not be put to shame” (Isa 54:4). 

     “For the scripture saith, Whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed” (Rom 10:11).

            SECOND, He has inspired holy men to record their requests that they not be ashamed, confounded, or disappointed. 

     “In thee, O LORD, do I put my trust: let me never be put to confusion” (Psa 71:1). 

     “O my God, I trust in thee: let me not be ashamed, let not mine enemies triumph over me” (Psa 25:2). 

     “O keep my soul, and deliver me: let me not be ashamed; for I put my trust in thee” (Psa 25:20). 

     “Let me not be ashamed, O LORD; for I have called upon thee” (Psa 31:17). 

     “Uphold me according unto thy word, that I may live: and let me not be ashamed of my hope” (Psa 119:116).

            We dare not read the book of Daniel without these things in mind. This is not the record of a mere hero, or one who excelled among his peers because of unusual natural abilities. Rather, it is the report of how God worked with a young man who was willing to trust Him. Daniel trusted the Lord when torn away from his homeland. He trusted Him while in a foreign land, and amidst heathen gods. He depended upon the Lord when he was asked to do things his faith did not allow. Daniel lived out what the Scriptures affirm to be truth.

EXAMINE US!

            Faith is not afraid to submit to the most meticulous scrutiny. The faith that keeps the soul also enhances the visible life with comely traits that cannot be condemned. Faith does not shout out, “Who are you to judge!” Rather, it boldly invites judgment! The person who cries out to God, “Examine me, O LORD, and prove me; try my reins and my heart” (Psa 26:2), and “Search me, O God, and know my heart: try me, and know my thought” (Psa 139:23), has nothing to fear from the examination of mere mortals!

            “Then let our countenances be looked upon before thee.” Other versions read, “Then let our appearance be examined before you,” ^NKJV and “Then let our appearance be observed in your presence.” ^NASB Daniel is not suggesting the steward merely look at them, but that he view them with a mind toward the king’s demands. He challenges the man to carefully examine them after ten days to see if anything inferior or unacceptable could be found in them – anything that would disqualify them from standing in the presence of the king.

            This reminds me of the challenge Peter hurled at “Annas the high priest, and Caiaphas, and John, and Alexander, and as many as were of the kindred of the high priest, were gathered together at Jerusalem.” When they questioned the Apostle about the healing of the impotent man, Peter replied, “If we this day be examined of the good deed done to the impotent man, by what means he is made whole; be it known unto you all, and to all the people of Israel, that by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom ye crucified, whom God raised from the dead, even by Him doth this man stand here before you whole” (Acts 4:9-10). Faith does not back away from scrutiny, cringe when put to the test, or cower and hide when examined.

            The thought has occurred to me that much of contemporary Christianity cannot stand up under the scrutiny of men. It has produced multitudes that are in no way better than those who are in total ignorance of God, and alienated from Him because of it. Such things ought not be! They are conditions that unveil the lack of faith in the very ones professing it.

COMPARE US!

            “ . . . and the countenance of the children that eat of the portion of the king's meat.” Other versions read, “Then compare our appearance with that of the young men who eat the royal food,” ^NIV and “You can then compare our appearance with the appearance of the young men who eat the royal rations.” ^NRSV

            Daniel urges that a comparison be made between the four children of Judah, and those who were given the royal fare of the king. This is to be a thorough examination, not a cursory one. From the standpoint of the Babylonian official, the test was to see if the lads were the worse for not eating the king’s food. From the standpoint of Daniel, Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah, it was to see if their faith was in vain, or if trusting in the Lord would be a source of shame.

            There are two possible meanings of “the children that eat of the portion of the king’s meat.” It could be those who were already in the king’s service. If that is the case, then the four boys would be compared with Chaldean servants who were at their peak. It could also be the other Jewish boys who did not have the scruples of Daniel. In that case, the comparison would be made with others who, like themselves, were being honed to perfection, but were not yet ready to stand before the king.

            The test that Daniel proposes reveals the magnitude of his faith, even though he was young. A person in the grip of fear and doubt would not suggest such a procedure. He knew that honoring God could not result in inferiority – not even in this world. Young Joseph refused to dishonor God by caving in to the lustful cries of Potipher’s wife (Gen 39:9). But this did not make him subaltern or inferior in anyway. Faith never pushes men lower, but rather raises them higher. It does not produce or make people inadequate, but imparts to them an adequacy that brings glory to God.

A Challenging Thought

            What value is faith, if it produces no difference? No change? Nothing for the true betterment of the individual? If those who have faith are no different than others, and often even inferior to them, what point is there to it? Much of the religion of our day has produced no moral or spiritual change in its constituents. The same sins that are prominent in the world are often found within the professed church. Its leaders have moral failures like political and business leaders of this world. All of this is a blotch upon the name of the Lord. If the queen of Sheba will rise in the judgment to condemn those who stood aloof from wisdom superior to that of Solomon, why will not Daniel, Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah, rise in judgment against those who wore Christ’s name, yet fell into all of manner of immorality?

            We have a situation before us where people are settling for creeds that do not change men. They embrace movements that do not transform, and positions that lack moral power. Consequently, a whole new theology has arisen that seeks to justify the fact that professed Christians are no different than those who deny His name and reject His salvation. I hear people fairly shouting out, “We are sinners like everyone else – except that we are forgiven ones.” Or, “I am just a sinner saved by grace.” “God loves us just the way we are.” Or, “The Lord accepts us just the way we are.” There are a host of trite little sayings like these that not only lack substance, they are a total misrepresentation of the effectiveness of faith.

            After all, the grace of God, which brings salvation, has not only appeared to “all men,” but is “Teaching us that, denying ungodliness and worldly lusts, we should live soberly, righteously, and godly, in this present world; looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Savior Jesus Christ; who gave himself for us, that he might redeem us from all iniquity, and purify unto himself a peculiar people, zealous of good works” (Tit 2:12-14). Where men have not been effectively taught to say “NO!” ^NIV to ungodliness and worldly lusts, they simply have not been taught by God’s grace. Nor, indeed, has grace brought them salvation. If people cannot live soberly, righteously, and godly in this world, then they do not have grace or the salvation it brings. If they are not looking for the glorious appearing of Christ, their profession is empty and meaningless. If they are not zealous of good works, and redeemed from the power of iniquity, they are a gigantic contradiction to the grace of God.

            How would it have sounded for the four children of Judah to have said to Ashpenaz or Melzar, “We make mistakes just like you Babylonians, except God has accepted us!” Or, “God doesn’t love us anymore than He does those who worship idols.” Do you suppose their Babylonian keepers would have given a second thought to their request for a special diet? And keep in mind, in our text, the difference will be seen in the appearance of the four lads – how they looked to those who examined them.

            It is quite true that those in Christ are not to “judge according to appearance” (John 7:24). That does not justify crude and worldly appearances, and that is not what our Lord intended to convey by those words. What He meant was that Satan can fabricate wholesome appearances, making people appear to be godly when they are really ungodly. You may rest assured that God, however, never cultures ungodly appearances among those who are godly. I sense in my spirit, however, that such a notion is being entertained by altogether too many people.

DO ACCORDING TO WHAT YOU SEE

            “ . . . and as thou seest, deal with thy servants.” Other versions read, “and as you see fit, so deal with your servants,” ^NKJV “and deal with your servants according to what you see,” ^NASB and “and treat your servants in accordance with what you see.” ^NIV

            It is clear that Daniel had confidence in the Lord. He was young. He was away from home. He was in a heathen country. Yet he knew that faith does not have geographical boundaries, nor does hope wither when in a foreign land. He could side with the Lord, seeking to honor Him by NOT defiling himself. He had no trouble leaving the outcome of the whole incident in the hands of the steward placed over them. He knew the appearance would be so significant, even a Babylonian could not miss it.

A WISE COURSE

            From the steward’s point of view, this was a wise course. If there was any doubt about how the whole procedure would conclude, Daniel had proposed something from which the steward could recover. It was to be three years before they would stand before the king for their final examination. If, at the first, only ten days were consumed, adequate time remained for full recovery to be made. In my judgment, this consideration would have made the whole thing of little consequence to the steward. It could also be concealed from Ashpenaz.

            While this way of thinking might be imagined in the steward, it would have been wholly unacceptable for Daniel. He had to be motivated by faith, not probabilities. Besides that, his intention was not to defile himself, and from that intention he could not turn away. Notwithstanding, he so presented the suggestion as to remove any fear of the steward entering into a condition from which he could not recover. Better to perceive how a matter will be judged by others, framing our actions so as to diffuse unnecessary difficulty.

An Unconventional Tactic

            I acknowledge that this may appear to be unbelief on the surface. However, allow me to show how God has employed this type of approach before. He has framed the fulfillment of His will in a way that does not allow potential opponents to suspect what is really taking place.

     Instance #1. There came a time when the Lord rejected Saul as king of Israel. After Samuel had mourned the rejection of Saul for some time, the Lord spoke to him. “And the LORD said unto Samuel, How long wilt thou mourn for Saul, seeing I have rejected him from reigning over Israel? fill thine horn with oil, and go, I will send thee to Jesse the Bethlehemite: for I have provided Me a king among his sons.” Fearful for his life Samuel replied, “How can I go? if Saul hear it, he will kill me.” The Lord replied, “Take an heifer with thee, and say, I am come to sacrifice to the LORD. And call Jesse to the sacrifice, and I will show thee what thou shalt do: and thou shalt anoint unto me him whom I name unto thee” (1 Sam 16:1-3). The Lord moved in such a way as to diffuse needless trouble. Of course, Samuel did, in fact, offer a sacrifice. However, that was not the chief purpose of his trip. 

     Instance #2. On one occasion, the king of Syria sent soldiers to arrest Elisha, who had been divulging the campsites and strategies of the Syrian king to the king of Israel. Early in the morning, Elisha’s servant arose, and seeing the whole city compassed with horses and chariots, cried out to his master, “Alas, my master! What shall we do?” Elisha then prayed the Lord would open the young man’s eyes, whereupon he beheld that the whole mountain was “full of horses and chariots of fire round about Elisha.” As the soldiers came down to Elisha, he prayed that God would smite them with blindness. He then went to the men, who were seeking him in that very place, and said, “This is not the way, neither is this the city: follow me, and I will bring you to the man whom ye seek.” He then led them to Samaria, which was the capital, where the Lord opened their eyes (2 Kgs 6:14-20). Did Elisha lie to the soldiers?

A TIME FOR COMPARISONS

            I remember another time when a comparison was in order. The challenge took place on Mount Carmel. There, on that mount, stood a lonely figure, aligned against four hundred and fifty prophets of Baal, and four hundred prophets of the grove. The children of Israel had also been gathered to the mount. Now Elijah stands before them and cries out, “How long halt ye between two opinions? if the LORD be God, follow him: but if Baal, then follow him.” Numbed by unbelief, the people “answered him not a word.” But that is not the end of the matter!

            Elijah then proposed a test. Two bullocks were to be brought forward. The prophets of Baal were to choose one for themselves, and Elijah would take the other. Each bullock was to be butchered, cut in pieces, and placed upon wood that was on an altar. No fire could be placed under the offerings. The prophets of Baal were to call upon their God first, after which Elijah would call upon the name of his God. The God who answered by fire, Elijah said, “let Him be God.” All of the people answered and said “It is well spoken” (1 Kgs 18:19-39). I am sure you know the rest of the account.

            Let me ask you a question. Do you suppose there was any doubt in Elijah’s mind about the outcome of this challenge? Could he have been so bold if there was the slightest question in his mind about which God would answer by fire? The answer is obvious, and requires no further comment. Elijah spoke by faith, with the full assurance of things hoped for.

            We are living in a day that needs to see a comparison between those who trust God and those who do not. People have seen enough similarities between professed Christians and the world. They have heard enough about fallen leaders and straying members. It has had its fill of Christian musicians with a worldly appearance, and church members with no more interest in the Lord than drinkers at the local pub.

            Somewhere, sometime, in some generation, the church of the Lord Jesus Christ needs to challenge the world to make a comparison. They need to stand their leaders before the world and call for a comparison. They need to stand their young people before them and demand a comparison. They need to present people who have been fed a steady and consistent diet of the Word of God, and call for a comparison! If there is no difference between what the church produces and what the world produces, it is because they both have the same spirit. This day calls out for real comparisons God needs to be vindicated by a godly people!

THE TIME OF TESTING ESTABLISHED

            “ ¹⁴ So he consented to them in this matter, and proved them ten days.” Other versions read, “So he consented with them in this matter, and tested them ten days,” ^NKJV “So he listened to them in this matter and tested them for ten days,” ^NASB “So he agreed to this and tested them for ten days,” ^NIV and “So he agreed to this proposal and tested them for ten days.” ^NRSV

            Extended discussion was not required. So far as the record is concerned, the proposal of Daniel was received without hesitation. In this, at least four worthy principles can be seen. These are matters that cannot be learned like mathematical tables. Rather, they are perceptions into which faith ushers us.

PERCEIVED AS TRUSTWORTHY

            The fact that Ashpenaz listened to Daniel, and Melzar received his proposal, confirm that Daniel was perceived as trustworthy. He was obviously a noteworthy young man whose conduct did not detract from his abilities. The gifts and abilities of many people are overshadowed by their lack of moral fiber and looseness in conduct. They simply are people who cannot be trusted. Daniel was not such a person. The doctrine he embraced was “adorned” by the life he lived (Tit 2:10).

GOD HAD GIVEN DANIEL WISDOM

            It is also evident that God granted wisdom to Daniel – wisdom to frame his proposal in such a way as to make it acceptable. The word was spoken at the appropriate time, or “in due season” (Prov 15:23). Whether or not his words were given to him at that moment, I do not know. It does, however, appear to be a notable example of the Lord teaching in “the same hour what ye ought to say” (Lk 12:11). They were words with which a Babylonian official could find no fault. That is an example of the wisdom that comes down from above, which “is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, and easy to be entreated” (James 3:17).

GOD PREPARED THE WAY

            It is God’s manner to prepare the way for His people – to lead out before them, removing unnecessary obstacles. Surely Daniel was familiar with the word of the Lord to Israel. When they came out of Egypt, and before they came to the promised land, the Lord spoke of His direction of the people. “Behold, I send an Angel before thee, to keep thee in the way, and to bring thee into the place which I have prepared. Beware of him, and obey his voice, provoke him not; for he will not pardon your transgressions: for my name is in him. But if thou shalt indeed obey his voice, and do all that I speak; then I will be an enemy unto thine enemies, and an adversary unto thine adversaries. For mine Angel shall go before thee, and bring thee in unto the Amorites, and the Hittites, and the Perizzites, and the Canaanites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites: and I will cut them off” (Ex 23:20-23). Later He told them, “And I will send an angel before thee; and I will drive out the Canaanite, the Amorite, and the Hittite, and the Perizzite, the Hivite, and the Jebusite” (Ex 33:2).

            This is involved in the expression, “and the mountains shall be thrown down, and the steep places shall fall, and every wall shall fall to the ground” (Ezek 38:20). Again it is written, “Take the stumbling block out of the way of My people” ^NKJV (Isa 57:14). I suggest to you that the smoothness with which Daniel’s proposal was carried out confirms Divine preparation, as well as implementation.

THE OFFICIAL’S HEART TURNED

King Nebuchadnezzar’s mind on the matter of the boys diet was fixed. Ashpenaz gave no indication that he would violate the word of the king. How is it that the steward acquiesced so quickly to the plan advanced by Daniel. Nothing in Scripture suggests it was his manner to go against the word the king, or to act in contradiction of the clear word of “the prince of the eunuchs.”

            His heart had been softened by God, just as surely as God had brought Daniel into favor with “the prince of the eunuchs.” Thus is the truth confirmed, “The preparations of the heart in man, and the answer of the tongue, is from the LORD” (Prov 16:1). And again, “Man's goings are of the LORD” (Prov 20:24). It is still true that God can “put such a thing” in the king’s heart (Ezra 7:27). God can not only “turn” people ’s heart to “hate His people” (Psa 105:25), He can also make them “to be pitied” by the very ones who carried them captive (Psa 106:46). Blessed are the eyes that see this, and the heart that depends upon it. If you will allow it to do so, this record will cause faith and hope to grow in your heart.

TRUST IN GOD IS REWARDED

            “ ¹⁵ And at the end of ten days their countenances appeared fairer and fatter in flesh than all the children which did eat the portion of the king's meat.”

A NECESSARY OBSERVATION

            Again, I am very careful to note the manner in which the Scriptures have been recorded. This is a Divine manner, not a human one. The Spirit moves the writers from significant event to significant event, not from miniscule detail to miniscule detail. In the matter before us, we leap from before the first day of testing to its conclusion, with absolutely no details of the intervening period. Such details are not relevant to the record. There is a reason for this. If history was driven along by purely human influences, details, culture, and the likes, would be of significant importance. In them we could detect trends, the proclivities of those involved, and other such matters. However, if God is orchestrating the affairs for His own glory, the only details that are pertinent are the ones in which His particular influences are apparent. Thus we will learn primarily of His ways.

            For this reason, I want to briefly rehearse what we have seen thus far. I do this for a reason. It is that we may more clearly see that God’s Kingdom is driven by purpose – HIS purpose. That objective is not fulfilled by God tweaking the initiatives and responses of men, underwriting the good things men do, and overturning the bad things they do. 

     In the third year of Jehoiakim king of Judah, Nebuchadnezzar besieged Jerusalem (1:1). 

     The Lord gave Jehoiakim into the hand of Nebuchadnezzar, together with part of the vessels of the house of God (1:2). 

     The king brought these vessels into the treasure of the house of his god (1:2a). 

     The king speaks to one of his officials, commanding that he bring certain of the children of Israel, of the royal seed and princes (1:3).

     The children must have excellent qualities, and would be schooled to stand as advisors in the kings court (1:4). 

     A daily diet was established for these children, which included foods and wine from the king’s own provisions (1:5).

     Among these children were certain “children of Judah, Daniel, Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah” (1:6). 

     The prince of the eunuchs gave Babylonian names to these children (1:7).

     Daniel purposed in his heart that he would not defile himself with the portion of the king’s meat and the wine which he drank (1:8). 

     Daniel requests permission to not defile himself with the king’s food (1:8b). 

     God caused the official over Daniel to show favor and sympathy to him (1:9). 

     Ashpenaz refuses Daniel’s request, saying there was no good reason for them to be disgraced before the king, which would cost him his head (1:10). 

     Daniel presents his case to the next in command, a steward that was placed over the boys (1:11). 

     He proposes a ten day test in which the four children of Judah would eat only “pulse” and drink only water (1:12). 

     Daniel suggests they be tested at the end of the ten days, leaving the rest of the matter in the hands of the steward (1:13). 

     The steward consents to the proposal, and proved, or tested, them for ten days (1:14).